As part of my work, I need to annotate the reports generated using Coccinelle Scripts as bugs/FPs for recent Linux Kernels, recent as in versions > 3.0 till the current one 3.18.
As I’m reading the reports (newer ones), so today I completed Linux_realloc.new.org.
As part of my work, I need to annotate the reports generated using Coccinelle Scripts as bugs/FPs for recent Linux Kernels, recent as in versions > 3.0 till the current one 3.18.
As I’m reading the reports (newer ones), so today I completed Linux_intr.new.org.
As part of my work, I need to annotate the reports generated using Coccinelle Scripts as bugs/FPs for recent Linux Kernels, recent as in versions > 3.0 till the current one 3.18.
As I’m reading the reports (newer ones), so today I completed Linux_get.new.org.
As part of my project, while reading the reports, I came to know about bugs, using X after freeing it. There were many in the versions 2.4.x and 2.6.x. I was also required to list FPs (false positives) by Coccinelle. This post will be about, what I found for the case of using freed memory.
You can view the complete report as a PDF here and as a HTML file here.
As part of my project, while reading the reports, I came to know about bugs of type where unchecked values obtained from the user level are used as array indices or loop bounds.. These were less in the versions 2.4.x and 2.6.x. I was also required to list FPs (false positives) by Coccinelle. This post is be about the mentioned type.
You can view the complete report as a PDF here and as a HTML file here.
As part of my project, while reading the reports, I came to know about bugs where incorrect sizeof expressions are used, typically leading to allocation of data of the wrong size. There were many in the versions 2.4.x and 2.6.x. I was also required to list FPs (false positives) by Coccinelle. This post will be about, what I found for the mentioned case.
You can view the complete report as a PDF here and as a HTML file here.
As part of my project, while reading the reports, I came to know about bugs of type which were not checking for null before derefencing. There were many in the versions 2.4.x and 2.6.x. I was also required to list FPs (false positives) by Coccinelle. This post will be about, what I found for the case of NULL return values are tested before being derferenced or not?
You can view the complete report as a PDF here and as a HTML file here.
As part of my project, I was required to go understand the previous reports. Previous reports that are generated by tool Coccinelle. I need to list 10 bugs and 10 FPs(False positives by Coccinelle) in the reports.
You can look at the patterns here.
From large array size on stack to double unlocking, missing unlock, to dereferencing nulls, to use after freeing memory, Linux Kernel has it all.
This post is a How To on reading the reports.
This is the title of my project, that I’ll be working on this winter as a Gnome Linux Kernel Intern.
This blog post is the introduction about my project and what all I’ll be doing in it.
Today the count of patches I submitted to Linux kernel reached to 63. I used a lot of tools to submit patches to Linux kernel. This post will list all those tools that I used, how to use them and a bit more.
